Field guide

Dupery board notes: keep evidence separate from guesses

The short answer

Give each mark one meaning and keep the original statement beside its address and time. Connect a conclusion to the clue that supports it, so you can undo an assumption without losing the rest of the case.

Official material describes the notation tools. The photographed board is an earlier BETA v0.5.13 build; the suggested legend below is our method, not a built-in game convention.

Anchor a note to an address

Start with the numeric address, then the displayed role and exact announcement. If a role is later arrested, killed or otherwise changes its display, your note should still explain what you heard before the change. For a time-sensitive clue, add the hour or a clear “before/after” event.

Earlier Dupery board with numbered character cards, statements, a suspect list and colored strings connecting pins
An earlier build, BETA v0.5.13, shows addresses, statements and connected notes together. Open the full-size image to inspect the layout; current controls and values may differ.

The official tool set includes a pen, an erasing tool, pins, strings and scissors. Use the controls shown in your installed version; this page does not rely on older mouse bindings. The important habit is preserving the distinction between the game’s announcement and your annotation.

Use line style as well as color

A small, consistent legend is easier to read than a different color for every theory. Here is one suggested convention: a solid relation records what a statement directly says; a dashed relation records a possibility you are testing; a crossed relation records an elimination with a reason. Label the relation’s meaning rather than assuming “connected” always means “same alignment.”

#2#5Stated relation#2#3Untested possibility#2#4Eliminated, with a reason
An original note legend. Color helps, but the line pattern and written reason carry the meaning.

A question mark is often more honest than an alignment color. For example, “possible Drunkard” tells you why a displayed sum is uncertain; a bare red pin may hide that distinction.

Keep the reasoning dependency visible

Suppose you exclude address 1 because of a statement from address 4. Write both the exclusion and the condition: “exclude 1 if #4’s statement is reliable.” If #4 turns out to be an unreliable disguise, undo that exclusion before using the calculator again.

Statement from #4Reliability still assumedConditional constraintExclude address 1Narrowed combinationsUndo if the source fails
This chain makes a failed assumption easy to locate. It is not additional independent evidence.

Avoid treating several results downstream of one clue as separate corroboration. They inherit the same uncertainty. Keep an independent second reason beside a conclusion if one exists.

Save old information before a change

Time-dependent effects make “what did it say?” and “when did it say it?” equally useful. Milkman’s Demo rule changes alignment after the twenty-fourth hour. A clue obtained before that change and another obtained after it can disagree without proving a liar.

Your compact note can be: “#7 displayed Milkman; clue A at hour 20; alignment question still current?” Distinguish an earlier announcement from a current claim. When a state changes, update the current state rather than rewriting history.

Once a contradiction is resolved, keep only the notes that help the next decision. The board is a reasoning aid; it does not need to preserve every abandoned theory in equal visual weight.

Further reading